Industrial services

Move the next industrial decision.

From an incomplete requirement to accepted delivery, UI turns the work in front of you into a defined, evidence-backed route.

Explore services ↓Start a request ↗

Nine defined industrial assignments

Choose what is blocked now.

You do not need to know the service code. Start with the decision, quotation, purchase order or asset risk in front of you.

Open one assignment to see the inputs, decision-ready result, timing and commercial basis before you start.

01S01 · DefineCritical Requirement Review

Entry review01

“We have a real requirement, but the correct buying route is still unclear.”

Critical Requirement Review

Use this whenYou have an equipment tag, drawing, failure, quotation or deadline and need to identify the smallest defensible next step before further spend.

What we need from you

Available technical evidence plus a 60–90 minute working session.

What you receive

Information-gap register
Recommended execution route
Principal technical and commercial risks
Written next-step proposal

Commercial model

Fixed-fee diagnostic

After this result

Close, commission the smallest relevant Service, or request a Product quotation.

How this engagement runs

01
UI inventories the available evidence, operating facts, decision owner and deadline.
02
We expose the gaps and select the smallest credible commercial route.
03
You receive a written decision file; the review fee is credited if the follow-on project is commissioned.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Engineering / Technical Authority · Procurement / Strategic Sourcing · Operations / Maintenance · Project / Finance
Relevant industries: All priority industries
Required decision evidence: Information-gap register · Recommended execution route · Principal technical and commercial risks · Written next-step proposal
Terms used in the buying file: equipment tag · drawing revision · supplier quotation · failure evidence · decision deadline · operating consequence

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

A bounded discovery assignment before a larger mandate.

UI improvement

The paid review is credited into the next commissioned route, so diagnosis is not sold twice.

Responsibility boundary

This review selects a route; it is not engineering approval, supplier approval or a Product quotation.

Typical duration3–5 working days

Indicative fee€450–€900 · credited in full toward the commissioned follow-on project

Learn more ↗Review the requirement ↗

02S09 · DefineTechnical Definition & RFQ Pack

Strategic Sourcing & Cost Engineering02

“The need is real, but the requirement is not yet clear enough for suppliers to submit a usable, comparable quotation.”

Technical Definition & RFQ Pack

Use this whenYou know the duty or business outcome, but interfaces, scope, standards, evidence and acceptance criteria must be made quotable before supplier outreach.

What we need from you

Duty or required outcome, operating context, available drawings/data, interfaces, constraints, quantities and decision deadline.

What you receive

Controlled technical requirement and scope boundary
Interface, data-gap and responsibility registers
Supplier response template and commercial return format
RFQ pack with clarification and acceptance route

Commercial model

Fixed-fee technical-definition pack

After this result

Issue the RFQ internally, commission supplier discovery, or stop until the missing evidence is available.

How this engagement runs

01
UI recovers the duty, interfaces, constraints and acceptance result from the evidence and working sessions.
02
We separate required scope, client inputs, supplier responsibilities, options and exclusions.
03
You receive one issue-ready RFQ pack and a structured return format that makes supplier responses comparable.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Engineering / Technical Authority · Procurement / Strategic Sourcing · Project Management · Operations / Maintenance
Relevant industries: All priority industries
Required decision evidence: Controlled technical requirement and scope boundary · Interface, data-gap and responsibility registers · Supplier response template and commercial return format · RFQ pack with clarification and acceptance route
Terms used in the buying file: design basis · duty point · battery limits · interface register · vendor data requirements · deviations / exclusions · acceptance criteria

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

Structured RFQ inputs and supplier return fields before quotation.

UI improvement

The pack controls interfaces, responsibility and acceptance—not only a list of technical attributes.

Responsibility boundary

UI structures the requirement; specialist design authority, conformity decisions and client approvals remain explicitly assigned.

Typical duration5–15 working days after evidence review

Indicative feeFixed fee after evidence and complexity review

Learn more ↗Make this requirement quotable ↗

03S03 · DecideSupplier Discovery & Award Decision

Strategic Sourcing & Cost Engineering03

“We need qualified suppliers—or have offers that are incomplete and not genuinely comparable.”

Supplier Discovery & Award Decision

Use this whenYou need a credible supplier shortlist before quotations exist, or one normalized decision when supplier offers already exist.

What we need from you

Controlled requirement or available specification, quantities, geography, supplier restrictions, existing offers and decision deadline.

What you receive

Capability-based supplier longlist and qualification gate where needed
Controlled requirement and scope-normalisation matrix
Supplier capability, clarification and deviation register
Documented shortlist, negotiation or award recommendation

Commercial model

Fixed-fee discovery and/or decision pack

After this result

Issue the RFQ, negotiate, award, conditionally award, or stop.

How this engagement runs

01
UI determines whether the requirement is ready for supplier discovery or first needs S09 technical definition.
02
We qualify capability operation by operation and normalize every offer against one technical, commercial and acceptance baseline.
03
You receive a defensible shortlist or purchasing decision—not an unexplained supplier list.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Procurement / Strategic Sourcing · Engineering · Project · Finance / Cost Engineering
Relevant industries: All priority industries
Required decision evidence: Capability-based supplier longlist and qualification gate where needed · Controlled requirement and scope-normalisation matrix · Supplier capability, clarification and deviation register · Documented shortlist, negotiation or award recommendation
Terms used in the buying file: RFQ pack · technical bid evaluation · bid tab · should-cost · TCO · deviation register

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

Capability-based supplier qualification followed by a controlled, like-for-like decision matrix.

UI improvement

The route works both before and after quotations exist and makes the qualification gate explicit.

Responsibility boundary

UI documents evidence and recommendation; the client retains award authority unless UI separately contracts Product supply.

Typical duration1–4 weeks

Indicative fee€1,500–€7,500 per commissioned phase

Learn more ↗Find capability or compare offers ↗

04S04 · DecideImport Go / No-Go Pack

Supplier Quality & Delivery Assurance04

“We have a foreign supplier quotation. The real cost and operating risk are still unknown.”

Import Go / No-Go Pack

Use this whenAn equipment quotation already exists and you need the landed cost, importer responsibilities, documentation gaps, timeline and risks before commitment.

What we need from you

Supplier quotation, technical file, destination, Incoterm, intended use, site requirements and decision deadline.

What you receive

Supplier and quotation risk review
Preliminary conformity and document-gap register
Landed-cost model, logistics route and responsibility map
Go / conditional-go / no-go recommendation

Commercial model

Fixed-fee pre-commitment review

After this result

The client imports with UI coordination, UI quotes contracted supply, or the import stops.

How this engagement runs

01
UI reviews the offer, technical file, origin, destination, Incoterm and operating intent.
02
We expose documentation, conformity, customs, logistics, site and responsibility gaps before commitment.
03
You receive the real delivered-cost model, route, risks and written decision.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Procurement / Project · Engineering · Finance / CAPEX · Logistics / Customs / Conformity
Relevant industries: All industries importing industrial equipment or packages
Required decision evidence: Supplier and quotation risk review · Preliminary conformity and document-gap register · Landed-cost model, logistics route and responsibility map · Go / conditional-go / no-go recommendation
Terms used in the buying file: Incoterm · importer of record · HS classification · customs value · landed cost · conformity dossier · scope exclusions · responsibility matrix

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

Normalize supplier price into landed cost and a complete importer/site responsibility map.

UI improvement

The decision includes the route to operation, not only freight and duty arithmetic.

Responsibility boundary

Formal customs, legal and conformity conclusions require the appropriately appointed specialists and authorities.

Typical duration5–10 working days

Indicative fee€900–€2,500

Learn more ↗Check the real import route ↗

05S05 · ControlProject Execution & Supplier Control

Supplier Quality & Delivery Assurance05

“The PO is issued. Supplier progress, documents, changes, inspection and release need one controlled route.”

Project Execution & Supplier Control

Use this whenA supplier is executing an order and you need schedule, submittals, ITP/hold points, inspection/FAT, changes, NCRs, expediting and release evidence controlled against the contract.

What we need from you

PO or contract, specification, document list, schedule, supplier location, inspection/FAT requirements, acceptance points and required release date.

What you receive

Kickoff baseline, manufacturing schedule and weekly evidence report
Submittal register, ITP/hold points and technical-document control
Change, delay, NCR and open-points registers
Inspection/FAT evidence and documented release recommendation

Commercial model

Milestone project or retained project-control capacity attached to a live PO

After this result

Release, conditional release, corrective action, hold, or transition into the controlled delivery route.

How this engagement runs

01
UI baselines the contract, schedule, document register, ITP, hold points and acceptance criteria.
02
We coordinate progress evidence, submittals, changes, qualified inspection/laboratory work, FAT readiness, NCRs and expediting.
03
You receive one traceable control file and a release recommendation with unresolved responsibilities visible.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Supplier Quality Engineer / Quality Manager · Project Manager · Engineering / Technical Authority · Procurement / Buyer
Relevant industries: All project and equipment industries
Required decision evidence: Kickoff baseline, manufacturing schedule and weekly evidence report · Submittal register, ITP/hold points and technical-document control · Change, delay, NCR and open-points registers · Inspection/FAT evidence and documented release recommendation
Terms used in the buying file: PO baseline · vendor document schedule · ITP · FAT · NCR · expediting · MDR

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

Checklist/ITP → independent evidence → report → corrective action/reinspection → release decision.

UI improvement

The inspection gate sits inside a wider project-control system covering schedule, documents, changes and expediting.

Responsibility boundary

UI coordinates and verifies the agreed evidence; the producer executes manufacturing and named specialists execute regulated or certified work.

Typical durationProject-specific · minimum 3 months where recurring project control is required

Indicative feeFixed/milestone scope or €3,000–€10,000 / month per active project + approved specialist and travel costs

Learn more ↗Control this supplier ↗

06S06 · ControlManaged Delivery to Operation

Supplier Quality & Delivery Assurance06

“The equipment is approved. Nobody owns the route from shipping release to installed, accepted operation.”

Managed Delivery to Operation

Use this whenYou have approved the equipment and need one coordination route from shipping release to site handover. UI coordinates the interfaces; any physical Product supply is quoted separately.

What we need from you

Approved baseline, PO, S04 import decision pack or S05 shipment-release recommendation and control dossier; shipping-release, packing, preservation and transport evidence; import and delivery responsibilities; site readiness; installation, commissioning and SAT scope; milestones, MDR, punch list and handover requirements.

What you receive

Release-to-site baseline and responsibility matrix
Shipping-release, freight, customs and delivery control file
Site-readiness, installation-method and SAT interface register
Approved handover dossier, punch-list closure and acceptance record

Commercial model

Fixed or milestone coordination service; contracted Product supply is quoted separately

After this result

Close the punch list, compile the handover dossier and prepare the acceptance record for client approval and signature; then move to lifecycle support where required.

How this engagement runs

01
UI fixes the approved baseline, milestones, release-to-site route and responsibility matrix before movement starts.
02
We take over the authorised shipment status and coordinate packing and preservation evidence, freight, customs and delivery against the control file.
03
We control site readiness, installation method, work packages assigned to qualified parties and commissioning/SAT interfaces against the target start-up date.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Project / Site Management · Procurement / Logistics · Engineering / Construction · Commissioning / Operations · Supplier Quality
Relevant industries: All project and equipment industries
Required decision evidence: Release-to-site baseline and responsibility matrix · Shipping-release, freight, customs and delivery control file · Site-readiness, installation-method and SAT interface register · Approved handover dossier, punch-list closure and acceptance record
Terms used in the buying file: shipping release · packing list · lifting / transport plan · site readiness · RAMS / method statement · SAT · punch list · handover dossier

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

One control file ties milestones, responsibilities and evidence from shipping release through the site interfaces to the client-approved acceptance record.

UI improvement

The UI coordination fee, Product supply and all equipment, freight, customs, site and third-party costs remain separate and visible.

Responsibility boundary

UI coordinates the agreed route and evidence. Suppliers and named qualified parties execute freight, customs, installation, commissioning, SAT and statutory work.

Typical durationBaseline in 5–10 working days; execution timing is then project-specific

Indicative feeUI coordination fee from €5,000; equipment, freight, customs, site work and third-party costs are quoted separately

Learn more ↗Plan delivery to operation ↗

07S10 · DecideManaged Industrial Rental Route

Industrial Equipment Rental & Temporary Capacity07

“A shutdown, turnaround, outage, peak or emergency needs temporary operating capacity, but available equipment is not yet an executable site solution.”

Managed Industrial Rental Route

Use this whenMaintenance, projects, utilities and operations teams that need temporary power and distribution, compressed or oil-free air, pumping, dewatering or bypass, heating, cooling or load-testing capacity with the duty, site interfaces, evidence, service cover and return conditions defined.

What we need from you

Operating event and deadline; duty, capacity, medium and redundancy; site and environmental conditions; rental and operating window; delivery, installation, operation and service boundary; compliance, commercial and return requirements.

What you receive

Temporary-duty, operating-window and acceptance baseline
Site-readiness, interface and responsibility matrix
Qualified availability, compliance-gap and full delivered-and-return cost comparison
Reservation, mobilisation, service-response, off-hire and return control file

Commercial model

Fixed-fee screen, fixed-fee comparison and milestone mobilisation service; fleet rental or any UI Product/supply quotation remains separate.

After this result

Stop, correct the duty or site boundary, reserve a qualified configuration, or commission mobilisation and return control.

How this engagement runs

01
UI freezes the operating event, consequence, duty, redundancy, window and acceptance basis before checking availability.
02
We close site readiness, connections, access, lifting, utilities, permits, HSE and responsibility boundaries.
03
We qualify the complete configuration, fleet evidence, accessories, service cover, exclusions, reservation status and full cost.
04
Where commissioned, UI coordinates reservation, dispatch, site acceptance, support, extensions, off-hire, demobilisation and return.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Maintenance / Shutdown · Utilities / Plant Engineering · Project / Site · Procurement
Relevant industries: Oil, Gas & Petrochemicals · Energy & Water · Food & Packaging · Heavy & Process · Industrial Machinery
Required decision evidence: Temporary-duty, operating-window and acceptance baseline · Site-readiness, interface and responsibility matrix · Qualified availability, compliance-gap and full delivered-and-return cost comparison · Reservation, mobilisation, service-response, off-hire and return control file
Terms used in the buying file: duty / capacity · rental window · mobilisation · accessories · standby · site conditions

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

One accepted duty and site baseline → qualified complete configurations → full delivered-and-return cost comparison → written reservation → controlled mobilisation, acceptance, off-hire and return.

UI improvement

The UI fee never hides fleet rental, deposits, transport, customs and taxes, accessories, fuel or energy, consumables, installation, operator, maintenance cover, insurance, site work, demobilisation, cleaning or decontamination, damage, extension or late-return charges.

Responsibility boundary

UI defines, compares and coordinates the rental route. The proposal names the fleet owner, contracting party and every technical and site responsibility. UI does not own the fleet or act as design authority, certifier, installer, operator or site HSE authority unless a separately contracted qualified party is named.

Typical durationAvailability screen in 2–5 working days after the minimum data are accepted; qualified comparison normally takes 5–10 working days. Reservation, mobilisation and the operating window are equipment-, route- and site-specific.

Indicative feeUI fee €900–€2,500 for the availability screen; qualified comparison from €2,500 and mobilisation control from €5,000. Fleet rental, deposits and every physical or third-party cost are quoted separately.

Learn more ↗Check rental feasibility ↗

08S07 · DecideRomania Production Benchmark

Manufacturing Outsourcing — Romania08

“We have a drawing, BOM or supplier quote. We need to know what production in Romania should cost.”

Romania Production Benchmark

Use this whenYou need a defensible Romania ex-works cost range and feasibility route for CNC, precision metal, sheet-metal, fabricated, welded or low/medium-volume industrial work.

What we need from you

2D/CAD or BOM, material and treatments, tolerances, annual volume and lots, quality/certification needs, packaging, destination and current quotation if available.

What you receive

Romania ex-works cost range and cost structure
Economic volume, tooling/NRE and realistic lead time
Manufacturing process, DFM risks and missing inputs
Negotiate / source in Romania / keep current supplier recommendation

Commercial model

Fixed-fee should-cost; market validation and managed production are separately commissioned

After this result

Negotiate, obtain market-backed quotations, commission Romanian supply, or keep the current supplier.

How this engagement runs

01
UI checks whether the technical and volume data can support a credible cost model.
02
We model material, labour, machine, setup, tooling, finishing, control, packaging and manufacturing risk.
03
Where commissioned, the model is validated through real signals from two or three suitable Romanian producers.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Procurement / Category · Cost Engineering · Operations / CAPEX · Supplier Quality
Relevant industries: Industrial Machinery · Energy & Water · Heavy & Process · Oil, Gas & Petrochemicals · Food & Packaging
Required decision evidence: Romania ex-works cost range and cost structure · Economic volume, tooling/NRE and realistic lead time · Manufacturing process, DFM risks and missing inputs · Negotiate / source in Romania / keep current supplier recommendation
Terms used in the buying file: should-cost · make-or-buy · DFM · tooling / NRE · ex-works · contract manufacturing

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

CAD/BOM and configuration inputs → transparent cost model → DFM/data gaps → market-backed quote.

UI improvement

Human review and Romanian production evidence replace a black-box instant price claim.

Responsibility boundary

The first result is a decision range, not an exact production quotation or unconditional local-capability promise.

Open the should-cost model ↗

Typical duration5–15 working days after data check

Indicative feeFixed fee after input and complexity review

Learn more ↗Benchmark production in Romania ↗

09S08 · ProtectInstalled Base & Critical Spares Program

Products · Lifecycle Support09

“We have an installed-base population, fragmented records and no defensible view of which continuity risks require action first.”

Installed Base & Critical Spares Program

Use this whenYou need to rank installed-base continuity risk and decide what to document, stock, source, repair, replace, modernise or monitor.

What we need from you

Agreed asset population, asset register or CMMS/EAM extract, BOMs, maintenance history, failure consequence, redundancy, stock and lead-time position, lifecycle notices and decision window.

What you receive

Asset and data-gap register
Criticality and obsolescence ranking
Interchangeability and qualified replacement routes
Prioritised critical-spares and 90-day action programme

Commercial model

Fixed-scope baseline or critical-spares programme; retained lifecycle desk only after baseline

After this result

Execute the priority actions, buy separately quoted critical Products, or activate the retained desk after proof.

How this engagement runs

01
UI defines and normalises the agreed asset population and available evidence.
02
We rank criticality, supportability, obsolescence, stock and lead-time exposure instead of treating every BOM line equally.
03
Each high-risk population receives an owned stock, source, repair, replace, modernise or monitor action.

View buying context ＋

Decision owners: Maintenance / Reliability · Asset Integrity · Operations · Procurement / Materials Management · Engineering / Technical Authority
Relevant industries: Oil, Gas & Petrochemicals · Energy & Water · Food & Packaging · Pharma & Life Sciences · Heavy & Process · Industrial Machinery
Required decision evidence: Asset and data-gap register · Criticality and obsolescence ranking · Interchangeability and qualified replacement routes · Prioritised critical-spares and 90-day action programme
Terms used in the buying file: asset register · criticality · supportability · obsolescence · critical spares · stock policy · turnaround window · replacement route

Why this mechanism is commercially defensible ＋

Validated mechanism

Portfolio baseline → criticality/obsolescence ranking → replacement routes → prioritised execution.

UI improvement

The programme connects each high-risk line to evidence, an action owner and a real supply/repair route.

Responsibility boundary

Operational consequence and stocking policy are confirmed with the client; UI does not infer plant-criticality from a BOM alone.

Typical duration2–8 weeks for L01/L02; L03 is a minimum three-month retained service after baseline

Indicative feeL01 €1,500–€4,500 · L02 €3,000–€9,000 · L03 €1,500–€5,000/month

Learn more ↗Assess installed-base risk ↗

How to read the ranges

Indicative fees exclude VAT, travel, accommodation, equipment value, rental charges, freight, duties, site works and third-party engineering, laboratory or inspection charges. The fixed quotation is issued after the scope, available data and UI contractual role are reviewed.

How UI is contracted

One decision. One visible commercial basis.

The first engagement is bounded. Product supply, third-party cost and retained capacity remain separate unless the quotation names them.

01Fixed diagnosticThe correct buying route is still unclear.

The client pays for

A bounded review and written next-step decision.

Examples

S01 Critical Requirement Review

02Fixed definition or decision packA requirement, supplier, quotation, import or cost decision must be made before commitment.

The client pays for

Defined evidence, an issue-ready pack and a go / conditional-go / no-go or award recommendation.

Examples

S09, S03, S04 and S07

03Project or milestone serviceA decision, PO or temporary operating need exists and supplier, rental, inspection, delivery or lifecycle work must now be controlled.

The client pays for

Named work packages, milestones, evidence, registers and acceptance gates.

Examples

S02, S05, S06, S08 and S10

04Physical Product supplyUI can responsibly sell the component, equipment or package with a defined delivery scope.

The client pays for

The Product price, supply-chain responsibility, evidence route, warranty boundary and delivery obligations.

Examples

Products T01–T06

05Retained capacity after proofA completed project has established recurring work, priorities and a measurable operating rhythm.

The client pays for

Defined monthly capacity, registers, actions, reporting and review gates.

Examples

Industrial, Lifecycle, Supplier Assurance and Romania Sales Desks

Outcome-linked fees apply only to the separate Romania market route.See M01–M03 ↗

Start with what is happening

Start with the file you have.

Send the drawing, quotation, purchase order or asset list. We will confirm the smallest credible scope and the evidence still missing.

office@uiindustry.com ↗Start request ↗